HODLong 后浪

Ep. 69: Ogle: Most of the time you're trading against yourself

Episode Summary

A wide-ranging conversation on trading psychology, investment research, risk management, and the tension between building businesses and investing. Mable and Ogle unpack how they form a thesis, test it against opposing views, size positions, handle being wrong, and avoid letting ego drive decisions.

Episode Notes

I restarted HODLong as a traders' talk and hosted Ogle as the first guest on the show. 

Show Notes

00:00 How Ogle first got into trading as a kid

05:17 Growing up poor and developing a complicated relationship with money

10:52 Stepping back from public life, building companies, and returning to trading

14:09 Why deep research comes before making meaningful investments

18:23 The core thesis: revenue, real users, and value flowing back to token holders

24:53 How to research founders, incentives, and whether a business can sustain its model

27:00 Early bets vs. later entries: balancing risk, upside, and conviction

29:41 Position sizing and the idea of a “sleeping size”

32:19 A real-time example of resizing a position when part of a thesis breaks

36:29 The “wrong train” mental model for cutting a losing position

38:05 Why opportunity cost matters more than comparing investments directly

41:19 What makes a business defensible: moats, partnerships, and distribution

46:16 Self-worth, luck, and proving you can still perform

50:37 Why strong founders can still lose: timing, capital, and staying close to users

57:23 How better user experience helped reshape perpetual trading

60:04 Why investing is easier to pivot than building a company

61:44 Actively looking for evidence that disproves your thesis

65:40 Turning trading lessons into durable mental models

68:23 Ego, detachment, and why traders are often competing against themselves

70:34 Managing liquidity risk and preserving optionality in large positions

72:49 Social trading, signaling, and the danger of performing for an audience

78:25 Closing thoughts: social media, visibility, and the Panopticon